[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
gravitational pull that prevails between all possible clusters of matter.
['] in all MONOPOLAR fields carriers of the like poles repel one another. The interactions
occurring between like electrical charges (e.g. positive charges repelling all other positive
charges) as well as those occurring between particles of gases forming pressure fields (e.g.
tendency to decompress) are the best examples of such a repulsion. Therefore, if gravity would
have a monopolar character, the particles of matter should repel one another, not attract. This
lack of repulsion denies the monopolar character of gravity.
["] around poles of all DIPOLAR fields, the field carriers form a dynamic pressure
(described by Bernoulli's Equation) which compress them together. This pressure manifests
itself as forces that pull the field's carriers together. For example, there is a well known
phenomenon of pulling a ping-pong ball into a fountain's water stream and then holding this ball
suspended within the stream. The forces that pull this ball are the same ones that we are talking
about (i.e. Bernoulli's dynamic pressures prevailing at outlets from poles). The forces of gravity
seem to be an exact equivalent to this dynamic pressure appearing in dipolar fields. This
confirms that gravity behaves as a dipolar rather than a monopolar field.
#2. The complete lack of evidence for the existence of two opposite monopoles of gravity
combined with the simultaneous wealth of evidence confirming the existence of a gravitational
dipole.
As we know, in all monopolar fields two opposite types of field carriers (e.g. positives and
negatives) are separated by a space subjected to the action of these monopoles. But in dipolar
fields the situation is reversed, i.e. two different spaces in which opposite field conditions prevail
are separated from each other by the field carriers (dipoles) being subjected to the action of
these spaces.
['] if gravity has a MONOPOLAR character, the second (opposite to matter) monopoles of
gravity should be found. But so far our highly sophisticated nuclear experiments have revealed
only particles and antiparticles which differ electrically but which are identical in gravitational
understanding. Thus, all known particles and antiparticles represent only two main electrical
components of the same matter and do not constitute opposite monopoles of gravity.
["] in DIPOLAR gravity, the Universe would be composed of two separate spaces, or
worlds, in which two opposite types of gravitational interactions would prevail (e.g. attraction in
our world and repulsion in this other one). Therefore, the same laws and phenomena, but
observed within each one of these two worlds, would also display drastic differences,
depending on which side of the gravitational dipole they are manifested. As a matter of fact, we
already know from physics examples of such dual behaviors. These are registered under the
name "wave-particle duality of nature". One of the manifestations of this duality is the
contemporary co-existence of the corpuscular and wave theories of light. As it is quoted in some
books "Physicists have been jokingly accused of believing in light waves on Mondays,
Wednesdays, and Fridays and in photons on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays" (see: O.H.
Blackwood and others: "General Physics", 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1973 page 665).
One of the simplest and at the same time the most satisfactory explanation of this duality can be
D-5
derived from the Concept of Dipolar Gravity. According to it, the consequences of the
corpuscular and wave theories of light originate from the simultaneous distribution of light
signals within the two different worlds. Depending in which of these two worlds light signals are
observed by a given instrument, the corpuscular or wave aspect of light is manifested. This
again confirms that the action of the gravitational dipole is already registered in physics.
#3. All attempts to detect the existence of two opposite monopolar worlds (i.e. our world
and "antiworld") have failed, whereas there are already registered worlds from both sides of the
gravitational dipole.
['] in MONOPOLAR gravity the opposite world (called antiworld) is claimed to be repelled
from our world, so it should be shifted into a remote corner of the Universe. Therefore this world
could be detected only in an astronomical manner. But almost two centuries of astronomical
search has not revealed even a trace of the antiworld or antimatter from which it would be
constituted. As it is stated in the book, "Worlds - Antiworlds",by Professor Hannes Alfven of the
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden - a widely recognized expert in antimatter,
"There is no definite evidence for the existence of antimatter in the cosmos". This again denies
the monopolar character of gravity.
["] if gravity has a DIPOLAR character, the world from the other side of the gravitational
dipole must occupy the parallel space to our world. In fact a technique which reveals a parallel
co-existence of the same object in two separate worlds is already known. This technique is
called "Kirlian photography". In this photography some damaged objects still reveal parts which
in the physical world are separated from them (e.g. photographs of damaged leaves may show
the outlines of the missing parts). The above again confirms the behavior of the Universe as
governed by Dipolar Gravity.
* * *
The above examples do not exhaust all the evidence which confirms the dipolar
character of gravity, and which simultaneously denies the presently adhered to monopolar
understanding of this field. Further examples of this evidence may be found in various other
disciplines, such as religion, parapsychology, medicine, ornithology, etc. Because both
concepts of gravity contradict each other, and only one of them can be correct, the existing
evidence shows that our present understanding of the gravitational field is entirely wrong and
leads to a misinterpretation of reality. Therefore it should be withdrawn from use as soon as
possible. It is in the common interest of all of us to repair the error that has been committed, and
to replace the present, misleading view of our Universe by the more correct one - based on the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
D2. The operation of our Universe ruled by dipolar gravity
The previous subsection has revealed that in one aspect our present understanding of
gravity is definitely wrong. This aspect is the polarity of the gravitational field. As has already
been indicated, present science recognizes gravity as possessing a monopolar nature, similar
to the one manifested by electrical charges. This chapter, however, shows that the gravitational
field has a dipolar nature, thus displaying similarities to the magnetic field (i.e. gravity, similar
to a magnetic field, also forms two opposite poles). The establishment of this dipolar character
of gravity allows us to make some deductions revealing what our Universe is like and how it
operates under the conditions of dipolar gravity.
All deductions concerning dipolar gravity must be started from the acceptance that this
field possesses two opposite poles. The first pole prevails in our world and produces all
gravitational interactions known at present. However, because of the concentric nature of
gravity, the second pole of gravitational field must be directed "inwards" and extend into another
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]